Influence of density and viscosity on deformation, breakage, and coalescence of bubbles in turbulence

TL;DR

This study uses direct numerical simulations to explore how density and viscosity differences influence bubble deformation, breakage, and coalescence in turbulent flows, revealing viscosity's dominant role over density.

Contribution

It provides new insights into the effects of viscosity and density ratios on bubble dynamics in turbulence, highlighting viscosity's significant impact on deformation and turbulence suppression.

Findings

Density differences have negligible effect on breakage and coalescence.

Increasing bubble viscosity reduces deformation and turbulence.

Higher bubble viscosity suppresses turbulence inside bubbles.

Abstract

We investigate the effect of density and viscosity differences on a swarm of large and deformable bubbles dispersed in a turbulent channel flow. For a given shear Reynolds number, Re=300, and a constant bubble volume fraction, Phi=5.4%, we perform a campaign of direct numerical simulations of turbulence coupled with a phase-field method accounting for interfacial phenomena. For each simulation, we vary the Weber number (We, ratio of inertial to surface tension forces), the density ratio (r, ratio of bubble density to carrier flow density) and the viscosity ratio (e, ratio of bubble viscosity to carrier flow viscosity). Specifically, we consider two Weber numbers, We=1.50 and We=3.00, four density ratios, from r=1 down to r=0.001, and five viscosity ratios, from e=0.01 up to e=100. Our results show that density differences have a negligible effect on breakage and coalescence phenomena, while a much stronger effect is observed when changing the viscosity of the two phases. Increasing the bubble viscosity with respect to the carrier fluid viscosity damps turbulence fluctuations, makes the bubble more rigid, and strongly prevents large deformations, thus reducing the number of breakage events. Local deformations of the interface, on the contrary, depend on both density and viscosity ratios. The opposite effect is observed for increasing bubble viscosities. We report that these effects are mostly visible for larger Weber numbers, where surface forces are weaker. Finally, we characterize the flow inside the bubbles; as the bubble density is increased, we observe, as expected, an increase in the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) inside the bubble, while as the bubble viscosity is increased, we observe a mild reduction of the TKE inside the bubble and a strong suppression of turbulence.