Opposition flow control for reducing skin-friction drag of a turbulent boundary layer

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that opposition flow control can reduce skin-friction drag in turbulent boundary layers by targeting large-scale motions, achieving up to 10% drag reduction through reactive wall-normal blowing jets.

Contribution

It introduces a reactive opposition control method with flow field analysis, showing effective large-scale motion targeting and quantifiable skin-friction reduction in turbulent boundary layers.

Findings

40% energy attenuation in large-scale motions

10% reduction in skin-friction drag

Effective targeting of large-scale turbulence

Abstract

This work explores the dynamic response of a turbulent boundary layer to large-scale reactive opposition control, at a friction Reynolds number of $Re_\tau \approx 2\,240$. A hot-film is employed as the input sensor, capturing large-scale fluctuations in the wall-shear stress, and actuation is performed with a single on/off wall-normal blowing jet positioned $2.4\delta$ downstream of the input sensor, operating with an exit velocity of $v_{\rm j} = 0.4U_\infty$. Our control efforts follow the work by Abbassi et al. [Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 67, 2017], but includes a control-calibration experiment and a performance assessment using PIV- and PTV-based flow field analyses. The controller targets large-scale high-speed zones when operating in ``opposing" mode and low-speed zones in the ``reinforcing" mode. An energy-attenuation of about 40% is observed for the opposing control mode in the frequency band corresponding to the passage of large-scale motions. This proves the effectiveness of the control in targeting large-scale motions, since an energy-intensification of roughly 45% occurs for the reinforcing control mode instead. Skin friction coefficients are inferred from PTV data to yield a direct measurement of the wall-shear stress. Results indicate that the opposing control logic can lower the wall-shear stress by about 3% with respect to a desynchronised control strategy, and by roughly 10% with respect to the uncontrolled flow. A FIK-decomposition of the skin-friction coefficient was performed, revealing that the off-the-wall turbulence follows a consistent trend with the PTV-based wall-shear stress measurements, although biased by an increased shear in the wake of the boundary layer given the formation of a plume due to the jet-in-crossflow actuation.