Comparison of Random Forest and Neural Network Framework for Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Nickel Superalloys
Raghunandan Pratoori

TL;DR
This study compares random forest and neural network models for predicting fatigue crack growth rates in nickel superalloys, demonstrating high accuracy with r^2 values above 0.96.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of machine learning frameworks for fatigue crack growth prediction in aerospace materials.
Findings
Both models achieved high prediction accuracy (r^2 > 0.96).
Neural network slightly outperformed random forest in accuracy.
Machine learning models are effective for fatigue crack growth prediction.
Abstract
The rate of fatigue crack growth in Nickle superalloys is a critical factor of safety in the aerospace industry. A machine learning approach is chosen to predict the fatigue crack growth rate as a function of the material composition, material properties and environmental conditions. Random forests and neural network frameworks are used to develop two different models and compare the two results. Both the frameworks give good predictions with of 0.9687 for random forest and 0.9831 for neural network.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFatigue and fracture mechanics · Fault Detection and Control Systems
