Imaging the ring and jet in M87 at 85 GHz with the ngEHT and ngEHT+ngVL

TL;DR

This study assesses the imaging capabilities of the planned ngEHT and ngEHT+ngVLA arrays at 85 GHz for the supermassive black hole in M87, focusing on resolving the black hole's ring and jet structures with improved fidelity and dynamic range.

Contribution

It demonstrates how combining ngEHT with ngVLA enhances imaging fidelity, dynamic range, and sensitivity for black hole and jet structures at 85 GHz, compared to ngEHT alone.

Findings

ngEHT alone improves resolution of the ring to ≤0.1 mas.

Adding ngVLA increases dynamic range by a factor of 3.5.

Combined arrays effectively image the outer jet structures.

Abstract

The Global mm-VLBI Array (GMVA) has demonstrated the ability to resolved what may be the general relativistic shadow of the supermassive black hole in M87 at 86 GHz, as well as delineate the inner jet to $\sim 1$~mas distance. We investigate the ability of the planned ngEHT, and the ngEHT + ngVLA at 85 GHz, to image such a nuclear 'ring', and the associated jet, using a constructed model based on the current estimate of the ring size, and a scaled version of the best VLBA image of the M87 jet at 43 GHz. While the resolution does not improve due to the limit set by the diameter of the Earth, the ngEHT alone should provide both a higher fidelity image of the ring on scales $\le 0.1$~mas, and a good image of a more extended jet to $\sim 1$~mas. Adding the ngVLA improves substantially the dynamic range (factor 3.5), as well as adds the ability to image structures on larger scales, in this case out to at least 5~mas, and potentially to much larger scales given the $\sim 10^5$ range in spatial scales covered by the ngVLA itself. Both arrays provide good image fidelity ($\le 0.1$), in the inner $\sim 1$~mas, but the ngEHT-only image does not reproduce the outer jet well, or at all, with fidelity values greater than unity. The combined array reproduces much of the outer jet with good fidelity ($\le 0.3$). Adding the ngVLA also decreases the susceptibility to antenna-based phase errors by a similar factor, and improves the ability for fringe fitting and subsequent phase and amplitude self-calibration. As for scales $< 100~\mu$as, ie. the ring itself, adding the ngVLA makes little change for very bright sources, where uniform weighting can be employed. But for faint sources, adding the ngVLA adds potentially an order-of magnitude sensitivity improvement (Issaoun et al. 2023).