Testing strengths, limitations and biases of current Pulsar Timing Arrays detection analyses on realistic data
Serena Valtolina, Golam Shaifullah, Anuradha Samajdar, Alberto Sesana

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness and biases of current pulsar timing array gravitational wave detection methods on realistic datasets, highlighting their strengths and limitations in identifying SMBHB signals.
Contribution
It systematically tests existing algorithms on realistic data, revealing biases and assessing their ability to detect SMBHB-generated gravitational waves.
Findings
Current models efficiently recover signals but exhibit biases.
Biases are due to signal-template mismatch, identified via P-P plots and KS statistics.
Results support SMBHB origin of observed signals in EPTA DR2.
Abstract
State-of-the-art searches for gravitational waves (GWs) in pulsar timing array (PTA) datasets model the signal as an isotropic, Gaussian and stationary process described by a power-law. In practice, none of these properties are expected to hold for an incoherent superposition of GWs generated by a cosmic ensemble of supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs), which is expected to be the primary signal in the PTA band. We perform a systematic investigation of the performance of current search algorithms, using a simple power law model to characterize GW signals in realistic datasets. We use, as the baseline dataset, synthetic realisations of timing residuals mimicking the European PTA (EPTA) second data release (DR2). Thus, we include in the dataset uneven time stamps, achromatic and chromatic red noise and multi-frequency observations. We then inject timing residuals from an ideal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
