Bright beacons? ALMA non-detection of a supposedly bright [OI] 63-um line in a redshift-6 dusty galaxy
M. Rybak, L. Lemsom, A. Lundgren, J. Zavala, J. A. Hodge, C. de, Breuck, C. M. Casey, R. Decarli, K. Torstensson, J. L. Wardlow, P. P. van, der Werf

TL;DR
This study reports a non-detection of the [OI] 63-um emission line in a z=6.03 galaxy using ALMA, challenging previous claims and indicating that detecting this line at high redshift is more difficult than expected.
Contribution
The paper provides the first ALMA non-detection of the [OI] 63-um line in a high-redshift galaxy, refuting earlier claims and highlighting observational challenges.
Findings
The [OI] 63-um line was not detected with ALMA, setting a new upper flux limit.
The non-detection suggests [OI] 63-um is harder to observe in z≥6 galaxies than previously thought.
Previous claims of detection with APEX are refuted by the new ALMA data.
Abstract
We report a non-detection of the [OI] 63-um emission line from the z = 6.03 galaxy G09.83808 using ALMA Band 9 observations, refuting the previously claimed detection with APEX by (Rybak et al. 2020); the new upper limit on the [OI] 63-um flux is almost 20-times lower. [OI] 63-um line could be a powerful tracer of neutral gas in the Epoch of Reionisation: yet our null result shows that detecting [OI] 63-um from z6 galaxies is more challenging than previously hypothesised.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
