Non-monotonic flow variations in a TASEP-based traffic model featuring cars searching for parking

TL;DR

This paper introduces a TASEP-based traffic model with parking search behavior, revealing non-monotonic flow variations and phase transitions caused by the interaction of cruising and parking cars, emphasizing the impact of perturbations on traffic flow.

Contribution

It presents a novel TASEP variant incorporating parking search dynamics, demonstrating complex flow phenomena and phase behavior not seen in traditional models.

Findings

Non-monotonic steady-state current with injection rate

Re-entrant phase transitions observed

Flow disruptions caused by parking-related effects

Abstract

The Totally Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process (TASEP) is a paradigm of out-of-equilibrium Statistical Physics that serves as a simplistic model for one-way vehicular traffic. Since traffic is perturbed by cars cruising for parking in many metropolises, we introduce a variant of TASEP, dubbed SFP, in which particles are initially cruising at a slower speed and aiming to park on one of the sites adjacent to the main road, described by a unidimensional lattice. After parking, they pull out at a finite rate and move at a normal speed. We show that this model, which breaks many of the conservation rules applicable in other TASEP variants, exhibits singular features, in particular non-monotonic variations of the steady-state current with the injection rate and re-entrant transitions in the phase diagram, for some range of parameters. These features are robust to variations in the update rule and the boundary conditions.Neither the slow speed of cruising cars nor the perturbation of the flow due to pull-out maneuvers, taken in isolation, can rationalize these observations. Instead, they originate in a cramming (or `paper jam') effect which results from the coupling of these mechanisms: injecting too many cars into the system saturates the first sites of the road, which prevents parked cars from pulling out, thus forcing cruising cars to travel farther along the road.These strong discrepancies with even the qualitative trends of the baseline TASEP model highlight the importance of considering the effect of perturbations on traffic.