Using ChatGPT in HCI Research -- A Trioethnography
Smit Desai, Tanusree Sharma, Pratyasha Saha

TL;DR
This study uses trioethnography to explore HCI researchers' emotional, ethical, and bias-related experiences with ChatGPT, aiming to foster critical discussions on its role in inclusive technological development.
Contribution
It introduces a novel qualitative approach to understanding ChatGPT's impact in HCI research through collective lived experiences and theoretical provocations.
Findings
Emotional challenges like frustration and embarrassment when using ChatGPT
Lack of accountability and future considerations in ChatGPT design
Bias concerns from a Global South perspective
Abstract
This paper explores the lived experience of using ChatGPT in HCI research through a month-long trioethnography. Our approach combines the expertise of three HCI researchers with diverse research interests to reflect on our daily experience of living and working with ChatGPT. Our findings are presented as three provocations grounded in our collective experiences and HCI theories. Specifically, we examine (1) the emotional impact of using ChatGPT, with a focus on frustration and embarrassment, (2) the absence of accountability and consideration of future implications in design, and raise (3) questions around bias from a Global South perspective. Our work aims to inspire critical discussions about utilizing ChatGPT in HCI research and advance equitable and inclusive technological development.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
