A comparative data study on dinosaur, bird and human bone attributes -- A supporting study for convergent evolution

TL;DR

This study analyzes dinosaur, bird, and human bone attributes to explore evolutionary relationships, revealing that birds are closer to humans than dinosaurs and suggesting convergent evolution between birds and humans.

Contribution

It provides statistical evidence of bone attribute correlations and challenges assumptions about bird-dinosaur closeness, proposing convergent evolution with humans.

Findings

Birds are closer to humans than dinosaurs based on bone ratios.

Linear relationships exist between femur, humerus, and radii in dinosaurs.

Birds and humans show convergent evolution in bone structure.

Abstract

For over 165 million years, dinosaurs reigned on this planet. Their entire existence saw variations in their body size and mass . Understanding the relationship between various attributes such as femur length, breadth; humerus length, breadth; tibia length, breadth and body mass of dinosaurs contributes to our understanding of the Jurassic era and further provides reasoning for bone and body size evolution of modern day descendants of those from the Dinosauria clade. The following work consists of statistical evidence derived from an encyclopedic data set consisting of a wide variety of measurements pertaining to discovered fossils of a particular taxa of dinosaur. Our study establishes linearly regressive correspondence between femur and humerus length and radii. Furthermore, there is also a comparison with terrestrial bird bone lengths, to verify the claim of birds being closest alive species to dinosaurs. An analysis into bone ratios of early humans shows that terrestrial birds are closer to humans than that of dinosaurs. Not only on one hand it challenges the closeness of birds with dinosaurs, but on the other hand it makes a case of convergent evolution between birds and humans, due to their closeness in regressive fits. A correlation between bone ratios of dinosaurs and early humans also advances understanding in the structural and physical distinctions between the two species. Overall, the work contains evaluation of dinosaur skeletons and promotes further exploration and research in the paleontological field to strengthen the conclusions drawn thus far.