Search for Continuous and Transient Neutrino Emission Associated with IceCube's Highest-Energy Tracks: An 11-Year Analysis
R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, S. K. Agarwalla, J. A. Aguilar, M., Ahlers, J.M. Alameddine, N. M. Amin, K. Andeen, G. Anton, C. Arg\"uelles, Y., Ashida, S. Athanasiadou, L. Ausborm, S. N. Axani, X. Bai, A. Balagopal V., M., Baricevic, S. W. Barwick, V. Basu, R. Bay

TL;DR
This 11-year analysis of IceCube data searches for continuous and transient neutrino emissions associated with alert events, finding no significant signals except a transient blazar emission, and constraining the flux from potential sources.
Contribution
The study provides the first comprehensive 11-year search for neutrino emission linked to IceCube alert events, setting upper limits on flux and confirming the transient blazar emission.
Findings
No significant continuous neutrino emission detected from alert directions.
Transient emission from blazar TXS 0506+056 confirmed with 3 sigma significance.
Upper limit on total continuous flux from test positions set at 1.2e-15 (TeV cm^2 s)^-1.
Abstract
IceCube alert events are neutrinos with a moderate-to-high probability of having astrophysical origin. In this study, we analyze 11 years of IceCube data and investigate 122 alert events and a selection of high-energy tracks detected between 2009 and the end of 2021. This high-energy event selection (alert events + high-energy tracks) has an average probability of to be of astrophysical origin. We search for additional continuous and transient neutrino emission within the high-energy events' error regions. We find no evidence for significant continuous neutrino emission from any of the alert event directions. The only locally significant neutrino emission is the transient emission associated with the blazar TXS~0506+056, with a local significance of , which confirms previous IceCube studies. When correcting for 122 test positions, the global p-value is and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
