Quantifying Feature Importance of Games and Strategies via Shapley Values
Satoru Fujii

TL;DR
This paper introduces two methods using Shapley values to quantify feature importance in games and strategies, enhancing interpretability and human understanding of AI strategies.
Contribution
The paper proposes novel methods to interpret game strategies and AI decisions using Shapley values, bridging game informatics and explainable AI.
Findings
Methods produce intuitive explanations
Enhance understanding of AI strategies
Applicable to diverse games
Abstract
Recent advances in game informatics have enabled us to find strong strategies across a diverse range of games. However, these strategies are usually difficult for humans to interpret. On the other hand, research in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has seen a notable surge in scholarly activity. Interpreting strong or near-optimal strategies or the game itself can provide valuable insights. In this paper, we propose two methods to quantify the feature importance using Shapley values: one for the game itself and another for individual AIs. We empirically show that our proposed methods yield intuitive explanations that resonate with and augment human understanding.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance · Artificial Intelligence in Games · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
