PIE: Simulating Disease Progression via Progressive Image Editing
Kaizhao Liang, Xu Cao, Kuei-Da Liao, Tianren Gao, Wenqian Ye, Zhengyu, Chen, Jianguo Cao, Tejas Nama, Jimeng Sun

TL;DR
This paper introduces PIE, a novel framework that uses progressive image editing with generative models to simulate disease progression in medical images, aiding clinical diagnosis and treatment planning.
Contribution
PIE is the first framework to enable realistic, personalized disease progression simulation through controlled image editing using advanced generative models.
Findings
PIE outperforms existing methods in realism and disease classification confidence.
Physicians agree 76.2% of the time on the fidelity of generated progressions.
Theoretical analysis links the iterative refinement to gradient descent with decayed learning rate.
Abstract
Disease progression simulation is a crucial area of research that has significant implications for clinical diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. One major challenge in this field is the lack of continuous medical imaging monitoring of individual patients over time. To address this issue, we develop a novel framework termed Progressive Image Editing (PIE) that enables controlled manipulation of disease-related image features, facilitating precise and realistic disease progression simulation. Specifically, we leverage recent advancements in text-to-image generative models to simulate disease progression accurately and personalize it for each patient. We theoretically analyze the iterative refining process in our framework as a gradient descent with an exponentially decayed learning rate. To validate our framework, we conduct experiments in three medical imaging domains. Our results…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2024
Well written and tests the propose method/framework through various experimentations (3 different data sets/diseases).
The paper needs more clarifications regarding the experimental setting to support the drawn conclusions.
1. The task of editing medical images to inject or remove disease effects is of interest and is related to a long-standing problem of counter-factual generation. 2. The model generates visually authentic disease effects that are better than two comparison baselines.
1. Methodologically, the text condition seems to be a major part of the proposal. In fact, I believe it is the only mechanism that allows to model to "know" what is a "disease effect". However, it is discussed minimally in the method section, and is never discussed experimentally. 2. A core in these generative models in medical imaging is to show that the model does not hallucinate; the generated subject-specific disease should reflect realistic progression. The paper lacks quantitative evaluat
- The ability to simulate disease progression in medical images could have many relevant uses. - Evaluated on a number of different medical imaging modalities. - The results seem to be of good quality and the method novel. - Trained model checkpoints will be made available on publication according to the supplement.
- A fundamental problem with the work is the focus and claims related to modelling of disease trajectories or progression. It is not entirely clear what the authors mean when they use these terms, and since this is a critical part of the work, this should really be defined. Disease trajectory, I would understand to refer to the course of a disease over time. This could be in an individual or maybe as an average in a population. This would imply some predictive capability, and we are also told t
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
MethodsDiffusion · Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training
