A theory satisfying a strong version of Tennenbaum's theorem
Patrick Lutz, James Walsh

TL;DR
This paper constructs a consistent, computably enumerable theory with the property that no definitionally equivalent theory admits a computable model, using mutual algebraicity as a key tool.
Contribution
It introduces a theory satisfying a strong version of Tennenbaum's theorem, demonstrating limitations on computable models for certain theories.
Findings
Existence of a c.e. theory with no computable models under definitional equivalence
Application of mutual algebraicity in model theory
Answer to Pakhomov's question about computable models
Abstract
We answer a question of Pakhomov by showing that there is a consistent, c.e. theory such that no theory which is definitionally equivalent to has a computable model. A key tool in our proof is the model-theoretic notion of mutual algebraicity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
