Investigating the Atmospheric Mass Loss of the Kepler-105 Planets Straddling the Radius Gap

TL;DR

This study investigates the atmospheric mass loss of Kepler-105 planets near the radius gap, using RVs and TTVs to measure their masses, supporting photoevaporation as a key process in shaping their atmospheres.

Contribution

It provides the first combined RV and TTV analysis of Kepler-105, measuring planetary masses that support photoevaporation as a primary factor in the radius gap.

Findings

Kepler-105b is more massive than Kepler-105c despite being closer to the star.

Mass measurements suggest photoevaporation could explain the atmospheric differences in 76% of scenarios.

Other mechanisms like core-powered mass loss may also influence the planets' atmospheres.

Abstract

An intriguing pattern among exoplanets is the lack of detected planets between approximately $1.5$ R$_\oplus$ and $2.0$ R$_\oplus$. One proposed explanation for this "radius gap" is the photoevaporation of planetary atmospheres, a theory that can be tested by studying individual planetary systems. Kepler-105 is an ideal system for such testing due to the ordering and sizes of its planets. Kepler-105 is a sun-like star that hosts two planets straddling the radius gap in a rare architecture with the larger planet closer to the host star ($R_b = 2.53\pm0.07$ R$_\oplus$, $P_b = 5.41$ days, $R_c = 1.44\pm0.04$ R$_\oplus$, $P_c = 7.13$ days). If photoevaporation sculpted the atmospheres of these planets, then Kepler-105b would need to be much more massive than Kepler-105c to retain its atmosphere, given its closer proximity to the host star. To test this hypothesis, we simultaneously analyzed radial velocities (RVs) and transit timing variations (TTVs) of the Kepler-105 system, measuring disparate masses of $M_b = 10.8\pm2.3$ M$_\oplus$ ($ \rho_b = 0.97\pm0.22$ g cm$^{-3}$) and $M_c = 5.6\pm1.2$ M$_\oplus $ ($\rho_c = 2.64\pm0.61$ g cm$^{-3}$). Based on these masses, the difference in gas envelope content of the Kepler-105 planets could be entirely due to photoevaporation (in 76\% of scenarios), although other mechanisms like core-powered mass loss could have played a role for some planet albedos.