Why do drivers and automation disengage the automation? Results from a study among Tesla users
Sina Nordhoff, Joost De Winter

TL;DR
This study explores the reasons behind driver and system-initiated disengagements in Tesla's automated driving, proposing a triadic model that considers human, automation, and social factors affecting disengagement behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a novel triadic model of automation disengagements based on interviews, highlighting the interplay of human, automation, and social influences on disengagement decisions.
Findings
Disengagements occur due to anticipated failure and unnatural automation behavior.
Negative emotions like frustration and distrust influence disengagement decisions.
Social reactions from passengers and other road users also impact disengagement choices.
Abstract
A better understanding of automation disengagements can impact the safety and efficiency of automated systems. This study investigates the factors contributing to driver- and system-initiated disengagements by analyzing semi-structured interviews with 103 users of Tesla's Autopilot and FSD Beta. Through an examination of the data, main categories and sub-categories of disengagements were identified, which led to the development of a triadic model of automation disengagements. The model treats automation and human operators as equivalent agents. It suggests that human operators disengage automation when they anticipate failure, observe unnatural or unwanted automation behavior (e.g., erratic steering, running red lights), or believe the automation is not suited for certain environments (e.g., inclement weather, non-standard roads). Human operators' negative experiences, such as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
