The Proof of the Collatz Conjecture
Chin-Long Wey

TL;DR
This paper claims to prove the Collatz conjecture by constructing a tree structure representing sequences and developing a PathFinding algorithm to verify all sequences reach 1, addressing a longstanding unsolved problem.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel tree-based framework and a PathFinding algorithm to prove the Collatz and Syracuse conjectures.
Findings
All positive integers eventually reach 1 in the Collatz sequence.
The inverse functions successfully construct the sequence tree.
The PathFinding algorithm verifies the conjecture for all tested cases.
Abstract
The 3n+1, or Collatz problem, is one of the hardest math problems, yet still unsolved. The Collatz conjecture is to prove or disprove that the Collatz sequences COL(n) always eventually reach the number of 1, for all n belongs to N+ (all positive integers). The Syracuse conjecture is a (2N+1)-version of Collatz conjecture, where (2N+1) is all odd integers. The Syracuse and Collatz problem can be conceptually described by a tree trunk and branches. The trunk is made of the junctions that produce the main branches, where J0=1 is the root junction. Each branch consists of active and dead junctions, where only the active junctions are capable of producing new sub-branches. Conceptually assuming the trunk and branches can grow indefinitely and can also absorb nutrients from the root. As the tree grows indefinitely, all N+ (2N+1) are included for the Collatz (Syracuse) sequence. This paper…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection
