Using Artificial Neural Networks to Determine Ontologies Most Relevant to Scientific Texts
Luk\'a\v{s} Korel, Alexander S. Behr, Norbert Kockmann, Martin, Hole\v{n}a

TL;DR
This paper explores using neural networks, specifically transformer embeddings and various classifiers, to identify the most relevant ontologies for scientific texts, demonstrating the effectiveness of SVM in catalysis research.
Contribution
It introduces a method combining transformer embeddings with multiple classifiers to determine relevant ontologies for scientific texts, highlighting SVM's superior performance.
Findings
Support vector machine achieved the best classification results.
Random forest classifier performed the worst.
The approach is effective for catalysis research texts.
Abstract
This paper provides an insight into the possibility of how to find ontologies most relevant to scientific texts using artificial neural networks. The basic idea of the presented approach is to select a representative paragraph from a source text file, embed it to a vector space by a pre-trained fine-tuned transformer, and classify the embedded vector according to its relevance to a target ontology. We have considered different classifiers to categorize the output from the transformer, in particular random forest, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron, k-nearest neighbors, and Gaussian process classifiers. Their suitability has been evaluated in a use case with ontologies and scientific texts concerning catalysis research. From results we can say the worst results have random forest. The best results in this task brought support vector machine classifier.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques
MethodsGaussian Process
