Approximate co-sufficient sampling with regularization
Wanrong Zhu, Rina Foygel Barber

TL;DR
This paper extends the approximate co-sufficient sampling (aCSS) framework to handle constrained and penalized maximum likelihood estimators, enabling goodness-of-fit testing in complex, high-dimensional, and non-standard parametric models.
Contribution
It introduces aCSS extensions for constrained and penalized MLEs, broadening applicability to models like mixtures-of-Gaussians and high-dimensional Gaussian linear models.
Findings
Enables goodness-of-fit testing for complex models with regularization.
Handles high-dimensional and non-standard estimation problems.
Maintains power where traditional CSS fails due to degeneracy or complexity.
Abstract
In this work, we consider the problem of goodness-of-fit (GoF) testing for parametric models. This testing problem involves a composite null hypothesis, due to the unknown values of the model parameters. In some special cases, co-sufficient sampling (CSS) can remove the influence of these unknown parameters via conditioning on a sufficient statistic -- often, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the unknown parameters. However, many common parametric settings do not permit this approach, since conditioning on a sufficient statistic leads to a powerless test. The recent approximate co-sufficient sampling (aCSS) framework of Barber and Janson (2022) offers an alternative, replacing sufficiency with an approximately sufficient statistic (namely, a noisy version of the MLE). This approach recovers power in a range of settings where CSS cannot be applied, but can only be applied in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods · Statistical Methods and Inference
