Comparative Assessment of Markov Models and Recurrent Neural Networks for Jazz Music Generation
Conrad Hsu, Ross Greer

TL;DR
This study compares Markov models and recurrent neural networks for jazz music generation, demonstrating that RNNs produce more rhythmically consistent and tonally stable compositions based on quantitative metrics.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of Markov and RNN models for jazz improvisation, introducing objective metrics for evaluating generative music quality.
Findings
RNN outperforms Markov model on groove pattern similarity
RNN generates more tonally stable music
Metrics effectively quantify music generation quality
Abstract
As generative models have risen in popularity, a domain that has risen alongside is generative models for music. Our study aims to compare the performance of a simple Markov chain model and a recurrent neural network (RNN) model, two popular models for sequence generating tasks, in jazz music improvisation. While music, especially jazz, remains subjective in telling whether a composition is "good" or "bad", we aim to quantify our results using metrics of groove pattern similarity and pitch class histogram entropy. We trained both models using transcriptions of jazz blues choruses from professional jazz players, and also fed musical jazz seeds to help give our model some context in beginning the generation. Our results show that the RNN outperforms the Markov model on both of our metrics, indicating better rhythmic consistency and tonal stability in the generated music. Through the use…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMusic Technology and Sound Studies · Music and Audio Processing · Neuroscience and Music Perception
