A proof that no-signalling implies microcausality in quantum field theory
Antoine Soulas

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in quantum field theory, the no-signalling condition logically implies microcausality, establishing a fundamental link between these core principles and supporting their compatibility in relativistic quantum theories.
Contribution
The paper proves that no-signalling in quantum field theory implies microcausality and the spin-statistics theorem, clarifying their interdependence and foundational significance.
Findings
No-signalling is equivalent to factorization of the evolution operator.
No-signalling implies microcausality in quantum field theory.
Microcausality is necessary for spacelike separated operations.
Abstract
We study some logical interrelationships between fundamental properties in (relativistic) quantum theories. An operational no-signalling condition is first introduced in the context of quantum mechanics, where we prove its equivalence to an apparently weaker version restricted to ideal measurements, and to a property of factorization of the evolution unitary operator. We then translate this condition in quantum field theory and prove that it implies both microcausality and the spin-statistics theorem, in the ideal case of pointwise measurements implemented in the projection postulate sense. This provides an argument (often invoked but apparently missing in the literature) to see microcausality as a necessary condition for the compatibility of spacelike separated operations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
