Modelling individual motion sickness accumulation in vehicles and driving simulators

TL;DR

This paper develops and validates a personalized motion sickness model that accurately predicts individual susceptibility in vehicles and simulators, enhancing design and safety.

Contribution

It introduces a combined sensory conflict and accumulation model tailored for individual differences, validated with real datasets, and requiring only two parameters per person.

Findings

Model fits individual sickness responses with only 2 parameters.

Personalized models outperform group-averaged predictions by 1.7 times.

Group models cannot accurately predict individual sickness levels.

Abstract

Users of automated vehicles will move away from being drivers to passengers, preferably engaged in other activities such as reading or using laptops and smartphones, which will strongly increase susceptibility to motion sickness. Similarly, in driving simulators, the presented visual motion with scaled or even without any physical motion causes an illusion of passive motion, creating a conflict between perceived and expected motion, and eliciting motion sickness. Given the very large differences in sickness susceptibility between individuals, we need to consider sickness at an individual level. This paper combines a group-averaged sensory conflict model with an individualized accumulation model to capture individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility across various vision conditions. The model framework can be used to develop personalized models for users of automated vehicles and improve the design of new motion cueing algorithms for simulators. The feasibility and accuracy of this model framework are verified using two existing datasets with sickening. Both datasets involve passive motion, representative of being driven by an automated vehicle. The model is able to fit an individuals motion sickness responses using only 2 parameters (gain K1 and time constant T1), as opposed to the 5 parameters in the original model. This ensures unique parameters for each individual. Better fits, on average by a factor of 1.7 of an individuals motion sickness levels, are achieved as compared to using only the group-averaged model. Thus, we find that models predicting group-averaged sickness incidence cannot be used to predict sickness at an individual level. On the other hand, the proposed combined model approach predicts individual motion sickness levels and thus can be used to control sickness.