Viewing the process of generating counterfactuals as a source of knowledge: a new approach for explaining classifiers
Vincent Lemaire, Nathan Le Boudec, Victor Guyomard, Fran\c{c}oise, Fessant

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel perspective on counterfactual explanations by treating the simulation process as a knowledge source, demonstrated through additive models and naive Bayes classifiers.
Contribution
It introduces a new approach to explainable AI by leveraging counterfactual simulation as a knowledge generation process, especially in additive models and naive Bayes classifiers.
Findings
Counterfactual simulation can be used as a knowledge source.
Naive Bayes classifiers exhibit properties beneficial for this approach.
The method enhances understanding of model decisions.
Abstract
There are now many explainable AI methods for understanding the decisions of a machine learning model. Among these are those based on counterfactual reasoning, which involve simulating features changes and observing the impact on the prediction. This article proposes to view this simulation process as a source of creating a certain amount of knowledge that can be stored to be used, later, in different ways. This process is illustrated in the additive model and, more specifically, in the case of the naive Bayes classifier, whose interesting properties for this purpose are shown.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
