Measurement of the cross section of $e^+e^-\rightarrow\Xi^{-}\bar\Xi^{+}$ at center-of-mass energies between 3.510 and 4.843 GeV
BESIII Collaboration: M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, X. C., Ai, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, M. R. An, Q. An, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, I., Balossino, Y. Ban, V. Batozskaya, K. Begzsuren, N. Berger, M. Berlowski, M., Bertani, D. Bettoni, F. Bianchi, E. Bianco, A. Bortone, I. Boyko

TL;DR
This study measures the cross sections and form factors of the process $e^+e^- ightarrow ext{Xi}^- ext{Xi}^+$ across energies 3.510 to 4.843 GeV, observing evidence for $ ext{psi}(3770)$ decay and setting limits for other states.
Contribution
First measurement of the cross sections and form factors for $e^+e^- ightarrow ext{Xi}^- ext{Xi}^+$ over a wide energy range, including evidence for $ ext{psi}(3770)$ decay.
Findings
Evidence for $ ext{psi}(3770) ightarrow ext{Xi}^- ext{Xi}^+$ with 4.5$\sigma$ significance.
No significant signals for other charmonium(-like) states' decays to $ ext{Xi}^- ext{Xi}^+$.
Upper limits set for branching fractions and electronic widths of several states.
Abstract
Using collision data corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 12.9 collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, the exclusive Born cross sections and the effective form factors of the reaction are measured via the single baryon-tag method at 23 center-of-mass energies between 3.510 and 4.843 GeV. Evidence for the decay is observed with a significance of 4.5 by analyzing the measured cross sections together with earlier BESIII results. For the other charmonium(-like) states , , , , , and , no significant signal of their decay to is found. For these states, upper limits of the products of the branching fraction and the electronic partial width at the 90% confidence level are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
