A Two-Stage Method for Extending Inferences from a Collection of Trials
Nicole Schnitzler, Eloise Kaizar

TL;DR
This paper presents a novel two-stage method to synthesize data from multiple randomized trials, enabling causally interpretable estimates of treatment effects in a specific target population despite heterogeneity across studies.
Contribution
It introduces a new two-stage approach with assumptions for identifying and estimating the average treatment effect in a target population from heterogeneous trial data.
Findings
Method performs well in simulations
Applied to pediatric brain injury trials
Provides causally interpretable estimates
Abstract
When considering the effect a treatment will cause in a population of interest, we often look to evidence from randomized controlled trials. In settings where multiple trials on a treatment are available, we may wish to synthesize the trials' participant data to obtain causally interpretable estimates of the average treatment effect in a specific target population. Traditional meta-analytic approaches to synthesizing data from multiple studies estimate the average effect among the studies. The resulting estimate is often not causally interpretable in any population, much less a particular population of interest, due to heterogeneity in the effect of treatment across studies. Inspired by traditional two-stage meta-analytic methods, as well as methods for extending inferences from a single study, we propose a two-stage approach to extending inferences from a collection of randomized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
