Probing the Galactic halo with RR Lyrae stars -- IV. On the Oosterhoff dichotomy of RR Lyrae stars
Shan Zhang, Gaochao Liu, Yang Huang, Zongfei Lv, Sarah Ann Bird,, Bingqiu Chen, Huawei Zhang, Timothy C. Beers, Xinyi Li, Haijun Tian, Peng, Zhang

TL;DR
This study investigates the Oosterhoff dichotomy among RR Lyrae stars in the Milky Way halo and satellite galaxies, revealing its dependence on location, metallicity, and galaxy environment, and suggesting a complex origin.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the Oosterhoff dichotomy in the Galactic halo and satellite galaxies using 7D data, highlighting its variability and complex origins.
Findings
Oo I stars are more metal-rich with radial orbits.
Oo II stars are more metal-poor with mildly radial orbits.
The Oosterhoff dichotomy varies with position and galaxy environment.
Abstract
We use 3653 (2661 RRab, 992 RRc) RR Lyrae stars (RRLs) with 7D (3D position, 3D velocity, and metallicity) information selected from SDSS, LAMOST, and Gaia EDR3, and divide the sample into two Oosterhoff groups (Oo I and Oo II) according to their amplitude-period behaviour in the Bailey Diagram. We present a comparative study of these two groups based on chemistry, kinematics, and dynamics. We find that Oo I RRLs are relatively more metal rich, with predominately radially dominated orbits and large eccentricities, while Oo II RRLs are relatively more metal poor, and have mildly radially dominated orbits. The Oosterhoff dichotomy of the Milky Way's halo is more apparent for the inner-halo region than for the outer-halo region. Additionally, we also search for this phenomenon in the halos of the two largest satellite galaxies, the Large and Small Magellanic clouds (LMC, SMC), and compare…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
