A Quantitative Method to Determine What Collisions Are Reasonably Foreseeable and Preventable
Erwin de Gelder, Olaf Op den Camp

TL;DR
This paper introduces a quantitative method to determine which collisions are reasonably foreseeable and preventable for Automated Driving Systems, aiding regulatory approval and safety assessments.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, quantifiable approach considering the Operational Design Domain to evaluate residual collision risks in automated vehicles.
Findings
Method effectively estimates foreseeable and preventable collisions.
Supports setting safety requirements for ADS development.
Enhances justification for design and testing decisions.
Abstract
The development of Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) has made significant progress in the last years. To enable the deployment of Automated Vehicles (AVs) equipped with such ADSs, regulations concerning the approval of these systems need to be established. In 2021, the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations has approved a new United Nations regulation concerning the approval of Automated Lane Keeping Systems (ALKSs). An important aspect of this regulation is that "the activated system shall not cause any collisions that are reasonably foreseeable and preventable." The phrasing of "reasonably foreseeable and preventable" might be subjected to different interpretations and, therefore, this might result in disagreements among AV developers and the authorities that are requested to approve AVs. The objective of this work is to propose a method for quantifying what is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
