Average treatment effect on the treated, under lack of positivity
Yi Liu, Huiyue Li, Yunji Zhou, and Roland Matsouaka

TL;DR
This paper addresses the challenge of estimating the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) under lack of positivity, proposing a new overlap weighting method that avoids arbitrary threshold choices and improves estimation accuracy.
Contribution
The paper introduces the overlap weighted average treatment effect on the treated (OWATT), a novel method that relaxes threshold selection and enhances causal effect estimation under positivity violations.
Findings
OWATT performs comparably or better than trimming and truncation methods.
The method is validated through simulations and real data analysis.
OWATT reduces bias and variance in ATT estimation.
Abstract
The use of propensity score (PS) methods has become ubiquitous in causal inference. At the heart of these methods is the positivity assumption. Violation of the positivity assumption leads to the presence of extreme PS weights when estimating average causal effects of interest, such as the average treatment effect (ATE) or the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), which renders invalid related statistical inference. To circumvent this issue, trimming or truncating the extreme estimated PSs have been widely used. However, these methods require that we specify a priori a threshold and sometimes an additional smoothing parameter. While there are a number of methods dealing with the lack of positivity when estimating ATE, surprisingly there is no much effort in the same issue for ATT. In this paper, we first review widely used methods, such as trimming and truncation in ATT. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference
