Comparing recent PTA results on the nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background
The International Pulsar Timing Array Collaboration: G. Agazie, J., Antoniadis, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam, Z., Arzoumanian, J. Askew, S. Babak, M. Bagchi, M. Bailes, A.-S. Bak Nielsen, P., T. Baker, C. G. Bassa, A. Bathula, B. B\'ecsy

TL;DR
This study compares recent PTA results on the nanohertz gravitational wave background, finds consistency across different collaborations, and demonstrates benefits of standardized modeling and data extension for improved detection sensitivity.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of PTA results, introduces a standardized noise model, and explores data extensions to enhance gravitational wave background detection.
Findings
No significant differences in GWB parameters across PTAs
Standardized noise modeling reduces parameter tension
Data extensions improve GWB constraints and correlations
Abstract
The Australian, Chinese, European, Indian, and North American pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations recently reported, at varying levels, evidence for the presence of a nanohertz gravitational wave background (GWB). Given that each PTA made different choices in modeling their data, we perform a comparison of the GWB and individual pulsar noise parameters across the results reported from the PTAs that constitute the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA). We show that despite making different modeling choices, there is no significant difference in the GWB parameters that are measured by the different PTAs, agreeing within . The pulsar noise parameters are also consistent between different PTAs for the majority of the pulsars included in these analyses. We bridge the differences in modeling choices by adopting a standardized noise model for all pulsars and PTAs, finding that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
