Directional movement of a collective of compassless automata on square lattice of width 2
Sergey Sapunov

TL;DR
This paper investigates the ability of a collective of simple, compassless automata and pebbles to sustain directed movement on a narrow two-dimensional lattice, establishing the minimal conditions needed for such movement.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a collective of one automaton and four pebbles can maintain directed movement, whereas fewer pebbles are insufficient, clarifying the minimal requirements for directionality.
Findings
A single automaton with up to three pebbles cannot sustain directed movement.
A single automaton with four pebbles can maintain directed movement.
The study defines minimal conditions for collective movement without a compass.
Abstract
We study the following problem: Can a collective of finite automata maintain directed movement on a two-dimensional integer lattice of width 2, where the elements (vertices) are anonymous? The automata do not distinguish between vertices based on their coordinates of direction (that means each automaton has no compass). We considered collectives consisting of an automaton and some pebbles, which are automata of the simplest form, whose positions are entirely determined by the automaton. We demonstrate that a collective of one automaton and a maximum of three pebbles cannot maintain a direction of movement on the lattice. However, a collective of one automaton and four pebbles can do so.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · semigroups and automata theory · Optimization and Search Problems
