3D Ultrafast Shear Wave Absolute Vibro-Elastography using a Matrix Array Transducer

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel 3D shear wave vibro-elastography method using a matrix array transducer for ultrafast volumetric imaging at 2000 volumes/sec, enabling real-time tissue elasticity mapping with high accuracy.

Contribution

The paper presents the first real-time 3D shear wave elastography technique with ultrafast acquisition using a matrix array transducer, significantly improving speed and elasticity estimation accuracy.

Findings

Achieved volumetric acquisition at 2000 volumes/sec.

Estimated tissue elasticity with less than 8% error in homogeneous phantoms.

Successfully detected inclusions within heterogeneous tissue models.

Abstract

3D ultrasound imaging provides more spatial information compared to conventional 2D frames by considering the volumes of data. One of the main bottlenecks of 3D imaging is the long data acquisition time which reduces practicality and can introduce artifacts from unwanted patient or sonographer motion. This paper introduces the first shear wave absolute vibro-elastography (S-WAVE) method with real-time volumetric acquisition using a matrix array transducer. In SWAVE, an external vibration source generates mechanical vibrations inside the tissue. The tissue motion is then estimated and used in solving a wave equation inverse problem to provide the tissue elasticity. A matrix array transducer is used with a Verasonics ultrasound machine and frame rate of 2000 volumes/s to acquire 100 radio frequency (RF) volumes in 0.05 s. Using plane wave (PW) and compounded diverging wave (CDW) imaging methods, we estimate axial, lateral and elevational displacements over 3D volumes. The curl of the displacements is used with local frequency estimation to estimate elasticity in the acquired volumes. Ultrafast acquisition extends substantially the possible S-WAVE excitation frequency range, now up to 800 Hz, enabling new tissue modeling and characterization. The method was validated on three homogeneous liver fibrosis phantoms and on four different inclusions within a heterogeneous phantom. The homogeneous phantom results show less than 8% (PW) and 5% (CDW) difference between the manufacturer values and the corresponding estimated values over a frequency range of 80 Hz to 800 Hz. The estimated elasticity values for the heterogeneous phantom at 400 Hz excitation frequency show average errors of 9% (PW) and 6% (CDW) compared to the provided average values by MRE. Furthermore, both imaging methods were able to detect the inclusions within the elasticity volumes.