Exploring Cross-Cultural Differences in English Hate Speech Annotations: From Dataset Construction to Analysis
Nayeon Lee, Chani Jung, Junho Myung, Jiho Jin, Jose Camacho-Collados,, Juho Kim, Alice Oh

TL;DR
This paper introduces CREHate, a cross-cultural English hate speech dataset, revealing significant annotation disparities across countries and evaluating large language models' performance in this context.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel cross-cultural hate speech dataset and analyzes cultural differences in annotations, highlighting challenges in hate speech detection across diverse English-speaking populations.
Findings
Only 56.2% of posts achieved consensus across all countries.
Significant pairwise label difference rate of 26%.
LLMs perform better on Anglosphere country labels.
Abstract
Warning: this paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting. Most hate speech datasets neglect the cultural diversity within a single language, resulting in a critical shortcoming in hate speech detection. To address this, we introduce CREHate, a CRoss-cultural English Hate speech dataset. To construct CREHate, we follow a two-step procedure: 1) cultural post collection and 2) cross-cultural annotation. We sample posts from the SBIC dataset, which predominantly represents North America, and collect posts from four geographically diverse English-speaking countries (Australia, United Kingdom, Singapore, and South Africa) using culturally hateful keywords we retrieve from our survey. Annotations are collected from the four countries plus the United States to establish representative labels for each country. Our analysis highlights statistically significant disparities across…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
