Strategies for engaging clinical participants in the co-design of software for healthcare domains
Marceli Wac, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Chris McWilliams, Christopher, Bourdeaux

TL;DR
This paper explores strategies to improve engagement of clinical participants in co-design processes for healthcare software, highlighting challenges, interventions, and barriers encountered during a data annotation tool study.
Contribution
It evaluates the effectiveness of various engagement strategies in clinical co-design, providing insights into overcoming participation barriers in healthcare software development.
Findings
Certain engagement strategies improved participation rates.
Barriers included time constraints and clinical workload.
Interventions varied in effectiveness across study stages.
Abstract
Co-design is an effective method for designing software, but implementing it within the clinical setting comes with a set of unique challenges. This makes recruitment and engagement of participants difficult, which has been demonstrated in our study. Our work focused on designing and evaluating a data annotation tool, however, different types of interventions had to be carried out due to poor engagement with the study. We evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of each of these strategies, their applicability to different stages of co-design research and discussed the barriers to participation present among participants from a clinical background.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Policy Implementation Science · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Digital Mental Health Interventions
