Reporting activities for the oxygen evolution reaction: Do we compare apples to apples?
Marcel Risch

TL;DR
This paper evaluates current benchmarking protocols for the oxygen evolution reaction, highlighting inconsistencies and proposing improvements to ensure more comparable and reliable data in energy storage research.
Contribution
It critically assesses existing OER benchmarking methods and offers recommendations for standardized protocols to enhance data comparability.
Findings
Current protocols vary significantly, leading to inconsistent data.
Standardization is needed for reliable comparison across studies.
Proposed guidelines aim to improve benchmarking consistency.
Abstract
The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is a key enabler of sustainable chemical energy storage. Here, the author assesses the current status of protocols for benchmarking the OER in materials- and device-centered investigations and makes suggestions for more comparable data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Machine Learning in Materials Science
