Does the Cosmological Constant really indicate the existence of a Dark Dimension?
Carlo Branchina, Vincenzo Branchina, Filippo Contino, Arcangelo, Pernace

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the 'dark dimension' scenario linked to the cosmological constant, revealing UV-sensitive terms in effective field theory calculations that challenge previous assumptions and highlight the need for mechanisms to suppress these terms.
Contribution
It identifies previously overlooked UV-sensitive contributions in EFT calculations of vacuum energy, questioning the validity of the dark dimension hypothesis based on existing literature.
Findings
UV-sensitive terms invalidate the simple $ ho_{EFT} o m_{KK}^4$ relation
Matching $ ho_{swamp}$ and $ ho_{EFT}$ is more complex than previously thought
A mechanism is needed to suppress UV-sensitive contributions for consistency
Abstract
According to the "dark dimension" (DD) scenario, we might live in a universe with a single compact extra dimension, whose mesoscopic size is dictated by the measured value of the cosmological constant. This scenario is based on swampland conjectures, that lead to the relation between the vacuum energy and the size of the extra dimension ( is the mass scale of a Kaluza-Klein tower), and on the corresponding result from the EFT limit. We show that contains previously missed UV-sensitive terms, whose presence invalidates the widely spread belief (based on existing literature) that the calculation gives automatically the finite result (with no need for fine-tuning). This renders the matching between …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Scientific Research and Discoveries
