Tensor-Hom formalism for modules over nonunital rings
Leonid Positselski

TL;DR
This paper introduces and explores the concepts of t-unital and c-unital rings and modules, establishing their categorical properties, relations, and implications for nonunital ring theory and semialgebras over coalgebras.
Contribution
It defines t-unital and c-unital modules, proves their categories are abelian and equivalent, and analyzes their properties and behavior under ring homomorphisms.
Findings
Categories of t-unital and c-unital modules are abelian and equivalent.
Full subcategories of s-unital modules form hereditary torsion classes.
The paper connects these concepts to semialgebras over coalgebras.
Abstract
We say that a ring is t-unital if the natural map is an isomorphism, and a left -module is c-unital if the natural map is an isomorphism. For a t-unital ring , the category of t-unital left -modules is a unital left module category over an associative, unital monoidal category of t-unital --bimodules, while the category of c-unital left -modules is opposite to a unital right module category over the same monoidal category. Any left s-unital ring , as defined by Tominaga in 1975, is t-unital; and a left -module is s-unital if and only if it is t-unital. For any (nonunital) ring , the full subcategory of s-unital -modules is a hereditary torsion class in the category of nonunital -modules; and for rings arising from small preadditive categories, the full subcategory of c-unital…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Advanced Topics in Algebra
