Independent set in $k$-Claw-Free Graphs: Conditional $\chi$-boundedness and the Power of LP/SDP Relaxations
Parinya Chalermsook, Ameet Gadekar, Kamyar Khodamoradi and, Joachim Spoerhase

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limits of convex relaxations for approximating maximum-weight independent sets in $k$-claw-free graphs, revealing that certain desirable bounds do not extend beyond the case $k=3$ and providing insights into the power of LP/SDP methods.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the conditional $ ext{chi}$-boundedness property does not hold for $k$-claw-free graphs when $k>3$, and establishes lower bounds on the strength of convex relaxations in this context.
Findings
Conditional $ ext{chi}$-boundedness fails for $k>3$.
SDP relaxations cannot always approximate maximum-weight independent sets within certain factors.
Provides lower bounds on convex program families stronger than existing relaxations.
Abstract
This paper studies -claw-free graphs, exploring the connection between an extremal combinatorics question and the power of a convex program in approximating the maximum-weight independent set in this graph class. For the extremal question, we consider the notion, that we call \textit{conditional -boundedness} of a graph: Given a graph that is assumed to contain an independent set of a certain (constant) size, we are interested in upper bounding the chromatic number in terms of the clique number of . This question, besides being interesting on its own, has algorithmic implications (which have been relatively neglected in the literature) on the performance of SDP relaxations in estimating the value of maximum-weight independent set. For , Chudnovsky and Seymour (JCTB 2010) prove that any -claw-free graph with an independent set of size three must satisfy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
