An Approach to Evaluate User Interfaces in a Scholarly Knowledge Communication Domain
Denis Obrezkov, Allard Oelen, and S\"oren Auer

TL;DR
This paper presents a tailored approach for evaluating user interfaces in scholarly knowledge graphs, adapting the Cognitive Walkthrough method to domain-specific needs, demonstrated on the Open Research Knowledge Graph.
Contribution
It introduces a domain-specific adaptation of the Cognitive Walkthrough for user interface evaluation in scholarly knowledge communication.
Findings
Effective evaluation of scholarly knowledge graph interfaces
Tailored questions improve domain-specific usability assessment
Demonstrated on Open Research Knowledge Graph
Abstract
The amount of research articles produced every day is overwhelming: scholarly knowledge is getting harder to communicate and easier to get lost. A possible solution is to represent the information in knowledge graphs: structures representing knowledge in networks of entities, their semantic types, and relationships between them. But this solution has its own drawback: given its very specific task, it requires new methods for designing and evaluating user interfaces. In this paper, we propose an approach for user interface evaluation in the knowledge communication domain. We base our methodology on the well-established Cognitive Walkthough approach but employ a different set of questions, tailoring the method towards domain-specific needs. We demonstrate our approach on a scholarly knowledge graph implementation called Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
