"Would life be more interesting if I were in AI?" Answering Counterfactuals based on Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming
Kilian R\"uckschlo{\ss} (Ludwig-Maximilians Universit\"at), Felix, Weitk\"amper (Ludwig-Maximilians Universit\"at)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a causal framework for probabilistic logic programs, enabling counterfactual reasoning by reconstructing programs from their distributions, which improves the ability to perform counterfactual queries.
Contribution
It proposes a new language fragment that allows learning probabilistic logic programs supporting counterfactual reasoning from observational data.
Findings
A new causal framework for probabilistic logic programs.
A method to reconstruct programs supporting counterfactual queries.
Enhanced capability for counterfactual reasoning in probabilistic logic programming.
Abstract
Probabilistic logic programs are logic programs where some facts hold with a specified probability. Here, we investigate these programs with a causal framework that allows counterfactual queries. Learning the program structure from observational data is usually done through heuristic search relying on statistical tests. However, these statistical tests lack information about the causal mechanism generating the data, which makes it unfeasible to use the resulting programs for counterfactual reasoning. To address this, we propose a language fragment that allows reconstructing a program from its induced distribution. This further enables us to learn programs supporting counterfactual queries.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
