Benchmarking for Integrating Logic Rules with Everything Else
Yanhong A. Liu (Stony Brook University), Scott D. Stoller (Stony Brook, University), Yi Tong (Stony Brook University), K. Tuncay Tekle (Stony Brook, University)

TL;DR
This paper introduces benchmarks for evaluating programming languages that integrate logic rules with other language features, providing a means to compare their performance and capabilities.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive set of benchmarks specifically designed for assessing integrated logic rule languages against other language types.
Findings
Integrated languages show varied performance profiles.
Benchmarks reveal strengths and weaknesses of different approaches.
Evaluation facilitates informed choices for language development.
Abstract
Integrating logic rules with other language features is increasingly sought after for advanced applications that require knowledge-base capabilities. To address this demand, increasingly more languages and extensions for such integration have been developed. How to evaluate such languages? This paper describes a set of programming and performance benchmarks for evaluating languages supporting integrated use of rules and other features, and the results of evaluating such an integrated language together with logic languages and languages not supporting logic rules.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
