Structural Node Embeddings with Homomorphism Counts
Hinrikus Wolf, Luca Oeljeklaus, Pascal K\"uhner, Martin Grohe

TL;DR
This paper introduces a theoretically grounded, interpretable node embedding method based on homomorphism counts, which effectively captures local graph structures and enhances explainability in graph machine learning tasks.
Contribution
It develops a novel isomorphism-invariant embedding framework using homomorphism counts, combining theoretical foundations with practical, explainable applications on benchmark datasets.
Findings
Effective node embeddings demonstrated on benchmark datasets
Embeddings are interpretable and compatible with explainable models
Comparable performance to advanced graph learning models
Abstract
Graph homomorphism counts, first explored by Lov\'asz in 1967, have recently garnered interest as a powerful tool in graph-based machine learning. Grohe (PODS 2020) proposed the theoretical foundations for using homomorphism counts in machine learning on graph level as well as node level tasks. By their very nature, these capture local structural information, which enables the creation of robust structural embeddings. While a first approach for graph level tasks has been made by Nguyen and Maehara (ICML 2020), we experimentally show the effectiveness of homomorphism count based node embeddings. Enriched with node labels, node weights, and edge weights, these offer an interpretable representation of graph data, allowing for enhanced explainability of machine learning models. We propose a theoretical framework for isomorphism-invariant homomorphism count based embeddings which lend…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
