Continual Learning with Dynamic Sparse Training: Exploring Algorithms for Effective Model Updates

TL;DR

This paper empirically investigates how different components of Dynamic Sparse Training affect continual learning performance, identifying optimal configurations for task-incremental learning on CIFAR100 and miniImageNet.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive analysis of DST components in continual learning, highlighting effective initialization and growth strategies for sparse networks.

Findings

ERK initialization is effective at low sparsity levels.

Uniform initialization is more reliable at high sparsity levels.

Adaptive DST components improve continual learning performance.

Abstract

Continual learning (CL) refers to the ability of an intelligent system to sequentially acquire and retain knowledge from a stream of data with as little computational overhead as possible. To this end; regularization, replay, architecture, and parameter isolation approaches were introduced to the literature. Parameter isolation using a sparse network which enables to allocate distinct parts of the neural network to different tasks and also allows to share of parameters between tasks if they are similar. Dynamic Sparse Training (DST) is a prominent way to find these sparse networks and isolate them for each task. This paper is the first empirical study investigating the effect of different DST components under the CL paradigm to fill a critical research gap and shed light on the optimal configuration of DST for CL if it exists. Therefore, we perform a comprehensive study in which we investigate various DST components to find the best topology per task on well-known CIFAR100 and miniImageNet benchmarks in a task-incremental CL setup since our primary focus is to evaluate the performance of various DST criteria, rather than the process of mask selection. We found that, at a low sparsity level, Erdos-R\'enyi Kernel (ERK) initialization utilizes the backbone more efficiently and allows to effectively learn increments of tasks. At a high sparsity level, unless it is extreme, uniform initialization demonstrates a more reliable and robust performance. In terms of growth strategy; performance is dependent on the defined initialization strategy and the extent of sparsity. Finally, adaptivity within DST components is a promising way for better continual learners.