A large sample of newly-identified carbon-deficient red giants from APOGEE

TL;DR

This study identified 103 new carbon-deficient red giants using APOGEE data, revealing their distribution across the Galaxy and their evolutionary phases, with detailed chemical composition analysis suggesting extensive hydrogen burning and varied origins.

Contribution

The paper significantly increases the known sample of carbon-deficient red giants and provides new insights into their distribution, evolutionary states, and chemical compositions.

Findings

103 new CDGs identified, tripling previous counts

CDGs are very rare, about 0.03% of giants

CDGs are found throughout all Galactic components

Abstract

Based on the APOGEE survey we conducted a search for carbon-deficient red giants (CDGs). We found 103 new CDGs, increasing the number in the literature by more than a factor of 3. CDGs are very rare, representing $0.03$~per cent of giants. They appear as an extended tail off the normal carbon distribution. We show that they are found in all components of the Galaxy, contrary to previous findings. The location of CDGs in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD) shows that they are primarily intermediate-mass stars ($2-4~\rm{M}_{\odot}$). Their extended distribution may indicate that CDGs can also sometimes have $M < 2.0~\rm{M}_{\odot}$. We attempted to identify the evolutionary phases of the CDGs using stellar model tracks. We found that the bulk of the CDGs are likely in the subgiant branch or red clump phase, whereas other CDGs may be in the red giant branch or early asymptotic giant branch phases. Degeneracy in the HRD makes exact identification difficult. We examined their C, N, and O compositions and confirmed previous studies showing that the envelope material has undergone extensive hydrogen burning through the CN(O) cycle. The new-CDGs have [C+N+O/Fe] that generally sum to zero, indicating that they started with scaled-solar composition. However, the previously known-CDGs generally have [C+N+O/Fe$] > 0.0$, indicating that some He-burning products were added to their envelopes. As to the site(s) in which this originally occurred, we do not find a convincing solution.