Halin's Infinite Ray Theorems: Complexity and Reverse Mathematics: Version E

TL;DR

This paper investigates the computational and proof-theoretic complexity of Halin's infinite ray theorems, revealing they are among the most complex in hyperarithmetic analysis and answering longstanding open questions in reverse mathematics.

Contribution

It demonstrates that several Halin-type theorems are hyperarithmetic and possess high proof-theoretic strength, providing new examples and resolving an open question in reverse mathematics.

Findings

Halin's theorems are hyperarithmetic, requiring iterated Turing jumps.

They exhibit high proof-theoretic strength, comparable to complex logical principles.

The work expands known examples of complex theorems in reverse mathematics.

Abstract

Halin [1965] proved that if a graph has $n$ many pairwise disjoint rays for each $n$ then it has infinitely many pairwise disjoint rays. We analyze the complexity of this and other similar results in terms of computable and proof theoretic complexity. The statement of Halin's theorem and the construction proving it seem very much like standard versions of compactness arguments such as K\"{o}nig's Lemma. Those results, while not computable, are relatively simple. They only use arithmetic procedures or, equivalently, finitely many iterations of the Turing jump. We show that several Halin type theorems are much more complicated. They are among the theorems of hyperarithmetic analysis. Such theorems imply the ability to iterate the Turing jump along any computable well ordering. Several important logical principles in this class have been extensively studied beginning with work of Kreisel, H. Friedman, Steel and others in the 1960s and 1970s. Until now, only one purely mathematical example was known. Our work provides many more and so answers Question 30 of Montalb\'{a}n's Open Questions in Reverse Mathematics [2011]. Some of these theorems including ones in Halin [1965] are also shown to have unusual proof theoretic strength as well.