Symplectic Groups, Mapping Class Groups and the Stability of Bounded Cohomology
Thorben Kastenholz

TL;DR
This paper explores the contrasting behaviors of bounded cohomology in mapping class groups and symplectic groups, revealing non-stabilization in certain cases and providing explicit norm calculations for signature classes.
Contribution
It demonstrates that bounded cohomology does not stabilize for mapping class groups and shows non-stabilization via isometries in symplectic groups, with explicit norm computations.
Findings
Bounded cohomology of mapping class groups does not stabilize.
Stable polynomials in Mumford-Morita-Miller classes are unbounded.
Bounded cohomology of symplectic groups stabilizes but not via isometries in degree 2.
Abstract
Mapping class groups satisfy cohomological stability. In this note we show how results by Bestvina and Fujiwara imply that the bounded cohomology does not stabilize, additionally we show that stabily polynomials in the Mumford-Morita-Miller classes are unbounded i.e. their norm tends to infinity as one increases the genus. While the bounded cohomology of the symplectic group does stabilize, we show that it does not stabilize via isometries in degree . In order to establish this we calculate the norm of the signature class in and estimate the norm of the integral signature class.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometry and complex manifolds · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
