Controlling Work Output and Coherence in Finite Time Quantum Otto Engines Through Monitoring
Rahul Shastri, B. Prasanna Venkatesh

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different quantum measurement schemes influence the work output and coherence of a finite-time quantum Otto engine, demonstrating control over engine performance through monitoring strategies.
Contribution
It introduces three pointer-based measurement schemes and analyzes their effects on work statistics and coherence in a quantum Otto engine, highlighting how monitoring can be used to control engine behavior.
Findings
Monitoring measurements can control work output and coherence.
Weak measurements reproduce no-monitor predictions for average work.
Strong measurements align with projective measurement results.
Abstract
We examine the role of diagnostic quantum measurements on the work statistics of a finite-time quantum Otto heat engine operated in the steady-state. We consider three pointer-based measurement schemes that differ in the number of system-pointer interactions and pointer measurements. We show that the coherence of the working substance and the work output of the engine can be controlled by tuning the monitoring measurements. Moreover, for a working substance consisting of a two-level system we show that while all three schemes reproduce the predictions of the cycle without any monitoring for the average work in the limit of infinitely weak measurement, only two of the schemes can reproduce the two-point projective measurement results in the limit of strong measurement.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
