TL;DR
This paper investigates whether graphs with large aspect ratios can be reweighted to have bounded aspect ratios while preserving shortest path structures, revealing exponential lower bounds in general graphs.
Contribution
It proves that while DAGs can be reweighted to bounded aspect ratio preserving shortest paths, general directed and undirected graphs require exponential aspect ratios, even approximately.
Findings
DAGs have shortest-paths preserving graphs with aspect ratio O(n)
General directed and undirected graphs can require aspect ratio exponential in n
Exponential lower bounds hold even for approximate shortest path preservation
Abstract
The aspect ratio of a (positively) weighted graph is the ratio of its maximum edge weight to its minimum edge weight. Aspect ratio commonly arises as a complexity measure in graph algorithms, especially related to the computation of shortest paths. Popular paradigms are to interpolate between the settings of weighted and unweighted input graphs by incurring a dependence on aspect ratio, or by simply restricting attention to input graphs of low aspect ratio. This paper studies the effects of these paradigms, investigating whether graphs of low aspect ratio have more structured shortest paths than graphs in general. In particular, we raise the question of whether one can generally take a graph of large aspect ratio and reweight its edges, to obtain a graph with bounded aspect ratio while preserving the structure of its shortest paths. Our findings are: - Every weighted DAG on …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Are there graphs whose shortest path structure requires large edge weights?· youtube
