Introductory quantum information science coursework at US institutions: Content coverage
Josephine C. Meyer, Gina Passante, Steven J. Pollock, Bethany R., Wilcox

TL;DR
This study surveys US instructors to identify consensus on core content for introductory quantum information science courses, aiming to guide curriculum development and assessment.
Contribution
It identifies common content items across courses and examines differences by level and discipline to inform research-based curriculum and assessment development.
Findings
Identified core content covered by at least 80% of courses
Highlighted differences in content coverage by course level and discipline
Discussed implications for developing a standardized QISE assessment
Abstract
Despite rapid growth of quantum information science and engineering (QIS/QISE) workforce development initiatives, perceived lack of agreement among faculty on core content has made prior research-based curriculum and assessment development initiatives difficult to scale. To identify areas if consensus on content coverage, we report findings from a survey of N=63 instructors teaching introductory QISE courses at US institutions of higher learning. We identify a subset of content items common across a large fraction (>=80%) of introductory QISE courses that are potentially amenable to research-based curriculum development, with an emphasis on foundational skills in mathematics, physics, and engineering. As a further guide for curriculum development, we also examine differences in content coverage by level (undergraduate/graduate) and discipline. Finally, we briefly discuss the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies
