Constraints on the persistent radio source associated with FRB 20190520B using the European VLBI Network

TL;DR

This study uses VLBI observations to confirm the compactness and association of a persistent radio source with FRB 20190520B, supporting models involving a magnetar wind nebula or hypernebula as the powering mechanism.

Contribution

First VLBI measurement confirming the compactness and precise localization of the PRS associated with FRB 20190520B, and its physical association with the FRB burst.

Findings

PRS is compact with size <9 pc

Burst position aligns with PRS within 20 mas

Supports magnetar or hypernebula models for PRS

Abstract

We present very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations of a continuum radio source potentially associated with the fast radio burst source FRB 20190520B. Using the European VLBI network (EVN), we find the source to be compact on VLBI scales with an angular size of $<2.3$ mas ($3\sigma$). This corresponds to a transverse physical size of $<9$ pc (at the $z=0.241$ redshift of the host galaxy), confirming it to be an FRB persistent radio source (PRS) like that associated with the first-known repeater FRB 20121102A. The PRS has a flux density of $201 \pm 34 \rm{\mu Jy}$ at 1.7 GHz and a spectral radio luminosity of $L_{1.7 \rm GHz} = (3.0 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{29}\,\mathrm{erg s^{-1} Hz^{-1}}$ (also similar to the FRB 20121102A PRS). Comparing to previous lower-resolution observations, we find that no flux is resolved out on milliarcsecond scales. We have refined the PRS position, improving its precision by an order of magnitude compared to previous results. We also report the detection of a FRB 20190520B burst at 1.4 GHz and find the burst position to be consistent with the PRS position, at $\lesssim20$ mas. This strongly supports their direct physical association and the hypothesis that a single central engine powers both the bursts and the PRS. We discuss the model of a magnetar in a wind nebula and present an allowed parameter space for its age and the radius of the putative nebula powering the observed PRS emission. Alternatively, we find that an accretion-powered 'hypernebula' model also fits our observational constraints.