Teaching mechanics with individual exercise assignments and automated correction
Michael H. Gfrerer, Benjamin Marussig, Katharina Maitz, Mia M. Bangerl

TL;DR
This paper presents a scalable method for creating, distributing, and automatically correcting individual exercise assignments in large mechanics courses, enhancing student engagement and understanding.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to generate and assess personalized exercises, addressing scalability and promoting reflective learning in large classes.
Findings
Students found the tool valuable for learning
The approach increased student engagement and reflection
Automated correction reduced grading workload
Abstract
Solving exercise problems by yourself is a vital part of developing a mechanical understanding. Yet, most mechanics lectures have more than 200 participants, so the workload for manually creating and correcting assignments limits the number of exercises. The resulting example pool is usually much smaller than the number of participants, making verifying whether students can solve problems themselves considerably harder. At the same time, unreflected copying of tasks already solved does not foster the understanding of the subject and leads to a false self-assessment. We address these issues by providing a scalable approach for creating, distributing, and correcting exercise assignments for problems related to statics, strength of materials, dynamics, and hydrostatics. The overall concept allows us to provide individual exercise assignments for each student. A quantitative survey among…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
