Inverse problem in the conditioning of Markov processes on trajectory observables : what canonical conditionings can connect two given Markov generators ?
Cecile Monthus

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which two Markov generators can be connected through canonical conditioning, providing explicit constructions of trajectory observables for continuous-time Markov processes, with applications to non-equilibrium systems.
Contribution
It establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for connecting Markov generators via canonical conditioning and constructs explicit trajectory observables for continuous-time processes.
Findings
Generators must involve the same elementary jumps or diffusion coefficients.
Explicit trajectory observables can connect different Markov processes.
Non-equilibrium processes can be viewed as conditioned equilibrium processes.
Abstract
In the field of large deviations for stochastic dynamics, the canonical conditioning of a given Markov process with respect to a given time-local trajectory observable over a large time-window has attracted a lot of interest recently. In the present paper, we analyze the following inverse problem: when two Markov generators are given, is it possible to connect them via some canonical conditioning and to construct the corresponding time-local trajectory observable? We focus on continuous-time Markov processes and obtain the following necessary and sufficient conditions: (i) for continuous-time Markov jump processes, the two generators should involve the same possible elementary jumps in configuration space, i.e. only the values of the corresponding rates can differ; (ii) for diffusion processes, the two Fokker-Planck generators should involve the same diffusion coefficients, i.e. only…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
